James McNeill Whistler, an American artist, was awarded damages of one farthing after John Ruskin's criticism of his work provoked a lawsuit. The lawsuit stemmed from Ruskin's review of Whistler's painting, "Nocturne in Black and Gold: The Falling Rocket," in which he described the piece as "flinging a pot of paint in the public's face." Whistler, feeling defamed by Ruskin's words, took legal action against the critic.

The trial, which took place in 1878, became a landmark case in the history of art criticism. Whistler, known for his flamboyant personality and sharp wit, defended his work passionately in court. He argued that his painting was a carefully crafted piece of art, not the result of careless splattering as Ruskin had suggested.

Ultimately, the jury ruled in favor of Whistler, awarding him damages of one farthing. While the monetary compensation was minimal, the verdict was a moral victory for the artist. It reaffirmed his reputation as a serious and talented painter, despite Ruskin's harsh critique.

To learn more about James McNeill Whistler and his legal battle with John Ruskin, you can visit the following links:

• Tate - James McNeill Whistler
• Encyclopedia Britannica - James McNeill Whistler
• The Met - James McNeill Whistler

Overall, the case of Whistler v. Ruskin serves as a reminder of the power of words and the importance of thoughtful and respectful criticism in the world of art. It also highlights the enduring legacy of James McNeill Whistler as a pioneering figure in the art world.

Sign Up